<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keyword Searches v. Concept Searches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ralphlosey.wordpress.com/2007/06/10/keyword-searches-v-concept-searches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ralphlosey.wordpress.com/2007/06/10/keyword-searches-v-concept-searches/</link>
	<description>A Team approach to electronic discovery combining the talents of Law and IT.  The views expressed in this blog are my own, and not necessarily those of my law firm or clients. Copyright Ralph Losey 2008. All Rights Reserved.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hundredth Blog: Thoughts on SEARCH and Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc. &#171; e-Discovery Team</title>
		<link>http://ralphlosey.wordpress.com/2007/06/10/keyword-searches-v-concept-searches/#comment-6682</link>
		<dc:creator>Hundredth Blog: Thoughts on SEARCH and Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc. &#171; e-Discovery Team</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 00:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ralphlosey.wordpress.com/2007/06/10/keyword-searches-v-concept-searches/#comment-6682</guid>
		<description>[...] Disability Rights Council of Greater Wash. v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., 2007 WL 1585452 (D.D.C. June 1, 2007), which I wrote about in Keyword Searches v. Concept Searches, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Disability Rights Council of Greater Wash. v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., 2007 WL 1585452 (D.D.C. June 1, 2007), which I wrote about in Keyword Searches v. Concept Searches, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inadequate Keyword Searches by Untrained Lawyers May, in Some Circumstances, be Sanctionable &#171; e-Discovery Team</title>
		<link>http://ralphlosey.wordpress.com/2007/06/10/keyword-searches-v-concept-searches/#comment-5679</link>
		<dc:creator>Inadequate Keyword Searches by Untrained Lawyers May, in Some Circumstances, be Sanctionable &#171; e-Discovery Team</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ralphlosey.wordpress.com/2007/06/10/keyword-searches-v-concept-searches/#comment-5679</guid>
		<description>[...] good idea. This is especially true when large amounts of ESI are involved. Then, more sophisticated concept-type search alternatives to keyword search should be considered because keyword searches alone may not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] good idea. This is especially true when large amounts of ESI are involved. Then, more sophisticated concept-type search alternatives to keyword search should be considered because keyword searches alone may not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Criminal Case Raises Interesting e-Discovery Search Issues &#171; e-Discovery Team</title>
		<link>http://ralphlosey.wordpress.com/2007/06/10/keyword-searches-v-concept-searches/#comment-5602</link>
		<dc:creator>Criminal Case Raises Interesting e-Discovery Search Issues &#171; e-Discovery Team</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ralphlosey.wordpress.com/2007/06/10/keyword-searches-v-concept-searches/#comment-5602</guid>
		<description>[...] world of e-discovery. It is especially true in the area of search, where newly developing forms of concept searching may soon make keyword searches obsolete. Judge Facciola mentioned this possibility in Disability [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] world of e-discovery. It is especially true in the area of search, where newly developing forms of concept searching may soon make keyword searches obsolete. Judge Facciola mentioned this possibility in Disability [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What the World Was Searching for in 2007? &#171; e-Discovery Team</title>
		<link>http://ralphlosey.wordpress.com/2007/06/10/keyword-searches-v-concept-searches/#comment-4875</link>
		<dc:creator>What the World Was Searching for in 2007? &#171; e-Discovery Team</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 19:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ralphlosey.wordpress.com/2007/06/10/keyword-searches-v-concept-searches/#comment-4875</guid>
		<description>[...] and popular references used by many different kinds of people. All keyword searches, and even concept searches, depend on that.  If you do not know the language and overall cultural mind-set of the custodians [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and popular references used by many different kinds of people. All keyword searches, and even concept searches, depend on that.  If you do not know the language and overall cultural mind-set of the custodians [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Charnock</title>
		<link>http://ralphlosey.wordpress.com/2007/06/10/keyword-searches-v-concept-searches/#comment-1417</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Charnock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 18:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ralphlosey.wordpress.com/2007/06/10/keyword-searches-v-concept-searches/#comment-1417</guid>
		<description>It is noteworthy - and welcome - that a court is acknowledging that there are better technologies out there than keyword search. . . . Technologies such as these are truly changing investigation, legal discovery and regulatory compliance, allowing a level of transparency never before contemplated in the legal system. In the face of federal law changes, this form of technology is something every corporate environment should consider as the software becomes more accessible and, arguably, essential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is noteworthy - and welcome - that a court is acknowledging that there are better technologies out there than keyword search. . . . Technologies such as these are truly changing investigation, legal discovery and regulatory compliance, allowing a level of transparency never before contemplated in the legal system. In the face of federal law changes, this form of technology is something every corporate environment should consider as the software becomes more accessible and, arguably, essential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
